- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Analyzing the provided openEMS code for errors or issues
Okay, let's tackle this openEMS code correction. First, I'll go through the user's code step by step to identify possible issues
Starting with the simulation parameters. The frequency range is 2-4 GHz, which makes sense for through-wall applications. The mesh resolution is set to lambda/30, which should be fine, but maybe check if it's too coarse for the PBG structure
Starting with the simulation parameters. The frequency range is 2-4 GHz, which makes sense for through-wall applications. The mesh resolution is set to lambda/30, which should be fine, but maybe check if it's too coarse for the PBG structure
Looking at the FDTD setup, they're using PML boundaries on all sides. For antenna simulations, sometimes it's better to use MUR absorbing boundaries instead of PML, especially if the structure is radiating into free space. But PML might be okay here. The Gaussian excitation is centered at 3 GHz, which is correct
The substrate is FR4 with a thickness of 1.6 mm. The code adds a box for the substrate, but the dimensions are 100x100 mm. That seems a bit large. Maybe reduce it to save computation time, but ensure it's larger than the PBG and antenna structure
The biquad parameters: quad_len is lambda/4. Wait, lambda at 3 GHz is about 100 mm, so lambda/4 is 25 mm. That's a reasonable size. The wire radius is 1 mm, which is a bit thick for a printed antenna. Maybe the user intended a planar structure, so using a cylinder with radius might not be correct. Perhaps they should use a flat polygon with a certain width instead of a cylindrical wire
The rotation matrix function looks correct, converting angles to radians and combining rotations. The draw_biquad function creates a polygon for the biquad shape. However, the AddPolygon command uses 10 as the priority and 1 as the normal direction. Wait, in openEMS, the polygon priority might need to be higher than the substrate's to ensure it's on top. Also, the normal direction (1 in this case) should correspond to the plane; maybe that's okay
The ports are added as lumped ports between two points. The feed_offset is 0.5, but multiplied by unit (mm), so 0.5 mm gap. That's very small. Maybe the feed gap should be a fraction of the wavelength or based on the antenna design. Also, the ports are added in the z-direction, but the biquad is in the xy-plane, so maybe the port orientation is incorrect. Should it be in the x or y direction instead?
The PBG structure is made of metal cylinders arranged in a grid. The spacing is lambda/6, which at 3 GHz is about 16.6 mm. The loop skips the central 3x3 area where the antenna is. But the grid_range is from -3 to 3, which gives 7 elements in each direction. Wait, the loop uses 'if abs(ix) <=1 && abs(iy) <=1', which skips the center 3x3 (since ix and iy go from -3 to 3). That leaves a 5x5 grid around the antenna. But the PBG might need more periods for effective performance. Maybe increase the grid_range to cover more cells
The mesh definition uses SmoothMeshLines, but the mesh.x and mesh.y are set to [-lambda/2, 0, lambda/2], which creates a mesh around the center. However, the PBG structure extends beyond this range. The mesh should cover the entire PBG and antenna structure. So the current mesh might be too small, leading to parts of the structure being outside the mesh, causing errors
In the WriteOpenEMS and RunOpenEMS section, the code seems correct, but the user might have issues with the simulation directory permissions or OpenEMS not being properly installed
Post-processing: The calcPort function is called with f0, but it's better to calculate over the frequency sweep. The S11 plot uses port{1}.S11, but if the simulation didn't run correctly, this would fail. Also, the ports might not be correctly defined, leading to incorrect S-parameters
Post-processing: The calcPort function is called with f0, but it's better to calculate over the frequency sweep. The S11 plot uses port{1}.S11, but if the simulation didn't run correctly, this would fail. Also, the ports might not be correctly defined, leading to incorrect S-parameters
Possible fixes:
- Replace the cylindrical biquad elements with planar polygons of appropriate width
- Adjust the mesh to cover the entire PBG and antenna structure
- Correct the port orientation and feed gap size
- Ensure the substrate size is adequate but not excessively large
- Verify the PBG structure's periodicity and number of elements
- Check boundary conditions, maybe switch to MUR for antenna simulations
- Use a correct frequency range in calcPort for S11 calculation over the sweep
Implementing these changes should make the code workable
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment